Monthly Archives: November 2007

Driftless

Danny Wilcox Frazier’s book “Driftless Photographs from Iowa” is published by Duke University Press and the Center for Documentary Studies at Duke University. It was the CDS/Honickman First Book Prize in Photography. The juror was Robert Frank, who wrote the forward.

Well, who wouldn’t want Robert Frank to write the forward to your first book? I would. I remember when I saw “The Americans” at the Kemper Museum in Kansas City a decade or so ago. I got chills. I liked Robert Frank before I saw the show, after it I was amazed.

The 80 pictures in this book are a testament to the fact that Robert Frank’s influence is alive and well in photography. Danny also acknowledges Josef Koudelka, Nan Goldin, Larry Clark and Gilles Peress. I know Danny is in the Real Photographer camp, no question about it.

The first time I met Danny was five or six years ago in Indianapolis during the women’s basketball Big 10 Tournament. Purdue played Iowa, and I think he sat next to me. He was working at one of the Iowa City papers (there are two). He was using a digital camera, I don’t think I was. I had my newly purchased Leica with me, and I remember him saying something about wanting one, and I said something about always wanting to shoot basketball with it. To me, that was a real photographer sort of thing.

I bumped into him yearly, usually during a Big 10 basketball tournament.

I am glad he bought his Leica and left the paper to go to grad school, where from what I understand, this book originated.

A few years later, I followed his plan (leave paper go to grad school). Needless to say, I asked his advice and sort of followed it, but here I am telling you about his book which you should buy right now. Danny is one of the nicest guys I have met and it is clear from his pictures that breaking down barriers and coming back with the goods (flat out great pictures) is something he has a talent for. To quote Jack Kerouac: “You got eyes.”

Danny has done some traveling, but this work is from his home state, which is very refreshing. In the age of the College Photographer of Year contest having an international story category, it is nice to see someone work the back 40 for all it is worth.

And work it he does. This is Iowa beyond the image of pigs, corn and politicians. Real people populate these pages. Veterans, rabble-rousers, Hasidim, farmers, Plain People, families all make an unexpected portrait of a state few truly know.

Danny Wilcox Frazier

In stark black and white images his Iowa appears on the page. Grain competes with snow and ice at times. Yes, grain, real grain, not the digital kind. The good kind, it comes from film.

Turning the pages I am struck by unexpected images. Moments come out the shadows. All the action is up close and personal. You feel the corn fly through the air while being harvested on the family farm. I hear snow crunch under the feet of hunters on their way to the killing fields. These pictures come alive.

Danny Wilcox Frazier’s clarity goes beyond what may be fashionable in some journalism circles. There are no fancy tricks of composition or electronic flash. He has the clear and direct voice of an Iowan adn the eyes of a poet.

Share

A Photographers Writes

Walker Evans

I have discovered Walker Evans in graduate school. I studied “Let Us Now Praise Famous Men” for a number of years, but I never appreciated it, or Evans, until graduate school.

While researching Evans recently, I discovered a slim volume published by the University of Texas in 1974. An exhibition of the Hale County, Alabama photographs, including unpublished images, was organized and a catalog with various historical and academic essays was published for the event.

The last essay by Garry Winogrand, who was teaching at UT at the time, is entitled “A Photographer Looks at Evans”. Winogrand, who liked word games, did not mince his words.

“Walker Evans’ photographs are physical evidence of the highest order of photographic intelligence. His photographs do not kowtow to anybody’s idea of how photographs should look.”

“There isn’t any pigeon-hole large enough for him. He is a photographer of whatever he conceives of as being an interesting problem for photography.”

“But the photographic snakepit-pit can yield some gold now and then, and does so here…Photographers accept their nuggets from any kind of mine, gratefully. Photography is like life and/or nature, profligate, as are the best photographers.”

Only a photographer who has thrived in the snake-pit would write this. The scholars and critics who have not pressed their eye to a viewfinder know this. I wish more photographers would write about their compatriots. Tim Davis likes to write, but he sounds like the ivory tower academics who have not slogged their way through the snake-pit while looking for a mine.

Garry Winogrand

Share

Apocalypse Now

Dear Reader,

There is a good chance that right now you could be experiencing a cold darkness in your soul. It is easy to explain, the Devil is at the door mark 36-28. The only way to repel the black and gold clad beast is to remind it that Sooner or later they will pay the piper again. It will be Sooner.

Shivering with you in the darkness,

Tom and the rest of the Jayhawk Nation.

Share

Careful, you might touch the camera!

I have been watching the BBC “Genius of Photography” shows on Ovation for the past couple of days. It has been interesting to see watch various photographers work and listen to them talk about their working methods.

One of the individuals I wanted watch was Gregory Crewdson, whose large scale staged photographs have slowly grown on me during my time in graduate school. I come from a long line of real photographers (people who pick up a camera and are not contemptuous of it) so Crewdson’s work was my polar opposite. Why stage something I would ask. Don’t get me wrong, I think his work is amazing, but I had read that he does not even trip the shutter. I started to wonder. I like the world he creates in his images, I am not sure if I like the the working methods.

But last night I lost it. He actually said he is not comfortable holding a camera and he does not trip the shutter himself. There is a director of photography and a camera operator on his sets, he just says “Hold it!” and then somone else takes the picture. You fraud was my first reaction reaction.

I have a hard time classifying him as a photographer. I doubt he does. Crewdson is the director. He is making single frame films, which is interesting, but I want him to hold the cable realease.

Crewdson can light, or I thought he could. He said something along the lines of my director of photography showed me how to really use light….ERRRR! Then they showed him in digital post changing the color of the lights because they were the wrong colors. I am splitting hairs probably, looking for something not to like, but his images amaze me.

I applaud his vision, I have a big time probably referring to him as a photographer. To say you don’t like holding a camera assaults my senses. What I think does not matter in the end because his work is successful in getting a strong emotional reaction out of me.

He is cinematic, it is no different than what a director does when making a film. Crewdson is creating single image movie. The rule making part of my brain wants to say no he is not a photographer just a still director.

Share

Two Variables

“In the still photograph you basically have two variables: where you stand and when you press the shutter. That is all you have,” Henry Wessel says directly in the beginning of this piece on him that was done by KQED. Shortly before I came to graduate school I found this New York Times story about Henry Wessel opened my eyes about a photographer I had not heard of. It is still hanging on my studio wall today.

He is of the generation that makes photography sound easy and exciting. Every time I watch this video I want to get away from the computer and go take pictures. “My craft is duplicating the light that exists in the physical world. That is my meassure of a good print,” he adds. What other benchmark could there be?

“Henry is a photographer’s photographer. It’s a dying breed actually, he knows his medium in a way that I don’t think many people learning photography today do. He is a craftsman of the highest caliber,” says Corey Keller, associate curator of photography at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, in the video. A photographer’s photographer, that is something to aspire to.

Wessel’s work reminds me of Garry Winogrand but warmer, more engaging, less confrontational. His vision is one that makes sense to me visually, difficult to put into words at times. Edward Keating is the same way. Robert Frank’s “The Americans” is along the same lines, but more intellectual.

In the end the photographs are the light of the real world photographed.

Share

On the lighter side

road.jpg

Richard Koci Hernandez, the Deputy Director of Photography/Multimedia at the San Jose Mercury News, put together one of his “home movies” at MultimediaShooter.com about flying from Oakland to Columbia, Mo. for the College Photographer of the Year judging. All of the pictures were take with his Canon digital point and shoot camera and time lapse with an iSight camera connected to his laptop. There is no video in this presentation.

The airplane flying around his seat was one of the high points of the show.

There are a number of times when I am traveling that I want to pull my camera out and photograph away, like Hernandez did this time. He made a greater whole out of what might not be interesting images. It runs smoothly, which is nice.

As a travelogue, the images work well without making me visually unbalanced, which can happen at time with the severe motion images. I wish more multimedia could be this simple and enjoyable.

Share

The Marlboro Marine

The iconic photograph of Marine Lance Cpl. James Blake Miller smoking a cigarette after the battle of Fallouja, taken by Luis Sinco, of the Los Angeles Times, gave Miller a taste of fame in 2004. This story is as much about the power of photography as it is about the effects of war on the human soul.

A new story on the Los Angeles Times and Mediastorm.org tells the story of Miller’s life after coming home to Kentucky. It takes all the varnish of glory off of any war story he could tell.

Miller’s voice is what makes this online multimedia story. Sinco has stayed in touch with Miller since he came back to the states. He may have “overstepped” the line when it comes to journalistic ethics, but the bond forged by the tow in Iraq, and Sinco’s humanity gives this story gut-wrenching depth and reality.

Part of the problem I have with multimedia on the web, is the technology can get in the way of the storytelling, which happened to me here. Several times, with two different web browsers, I had trouble getting the audio to play cleanly without it fading in an out. I feel this is a strong piece, but the experience is lessened by the audio at times.

Sinco’s clear direct images speak to the level of confidence that Miller has in him to tell his story honestly. Strong editing and sequencing adds to the package. Like almost all of the Mediastorm projects, this is very well done. In addition to the portrait of Miller, Sinco shows what it is like to be in the middle of an intense military conflict

A bigger question might be what role does Mediastorm play in the media landscape? Could the Los Angeles Times not have produced this in house?

Share